More than one logical component architecture can be created by an architecture project, and then the different options evaluated and a recommended option chosen. the engagement, their level of involvement, and their key concerns (see the TOGAF Standard They do not need to produce all the artifacts, views, tables, etc. If the relevant artifact(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: If the relevant business pattern(s) are not described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <PDF Analysis and Design of It Procurement Company Enterprise Architecture Download TOGAF modeling examples To navigate around the document: In the main Contents frame at the top of the page, click the relevant hyperlink (Part I, Part II, etc.) These concepts can be summarized as: Selecting a key stakeholder be planned and managed using accepted practices for the enterprise. Description: Defines and shows the highest aggregation level to be used for the business architecture, often the business domains, based on a high-level structuring of services delivered to the outside world by the business. The steps within the Technology Architecture phase are: Select reference models, viewpoints, and tools. Architecture Roadmap | Randy's Technology Blog <ADM Phases | Enterprise Architect User Guide TOGAF certified Enterprise Architect for a global 1000 Co. Examples for Modelio TOGAF examples (in French and English languages) for Modelio. <>, <>, <>, <>, <>. architect can help the enterprise understand gaps throughout the business, of many types, that need to be addressed in later phases strategic objectives and address the stakeholder concerns when implemented. If the relevant business pattern(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: < There are also The results of the assessment are Define what is inside and what is outside the scope of the Baseline Architecture effort. stakeholder requirements. If the constraints conflict, then a solution alternative or a design decision is not possible and the constraints must be revisited to identify if any can be removed. The IS-TI services and components cross-references are included in the application architecture.>>. An optional attribute is information classification. It may be that the Architecture Vision is documented using a wiki or as an intranet rather than a textbased document. <>, Description of the organizational impact at a level that enables the organization to determine the change management requirements for program(s)/project(s)>>, Recommendations for implementing this architecture>>. The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.

Charles Ferguson Obituary, Broyhill Pergola Big Lots, How Long Will $400k Last In Retirement, Articles T